THIS BLOG CURRENTLY IS INACTIVE. THANK YOU FOR STOPPING BY . . . . THIS BLOG CURRENTLY IS INACTIVE. THANK YOU FOR STOPPING BY . . . . THIS BLOG CURRENTLY IS INACTIVE . . . . THANK YOU FOR STOPPING BY.
Sunday, November 14, 2010
Exchanging Vibration for Linear Time
Here the channeled Abraham-Hicks points out the importance of tweaking the way we view the world around us. The emphasis is away from linear time/space matters and focuses instead on emotional and vibrational aspects of our beliefs.
It is just out, that the conundrum of the requirements of dark energy, being completely invisible and yet 75% of everything to support the apparent expansion of all space/time, that this situation may be illusory based on changing one fundamental assumption. If time is actually created as agreed in the big bang, then at the edges of things it is destroyed. Such a universe will appear to expand in the disappearance of time. This works mathematically and we already know that time varies with the approach to the cosmic speed limit, the velocity of light in a perfect vacuum.
Thus limits are not in this ultimate cosmic sense illusory but instead are fundamental and thinking about limitless expansion is dangerous without taking extreme care. If time is created once and then disappears over the course of things, all change comes to an end as well. We already have this inkling in the second law of thermodynamics. It is entirely possible that we have not yet got our vision right at all.
I have for years now taken what seems infinite from our present vantage and substituted the term indeterminate, meaning the limits are there but cannot be seen or sensed, just as apparent space time expansion may be the translation of the actual loss of time at the outer edges. It is too easy to stop short and then put on glasses of the chosen and desired hue. There is sufficient room for this to almost work out if you are willing to risk the surprise reversals inherent in the error.
Accepting the larger roominess that is inherent in our tendency to grow into our own capacity as a practice is not the same as limitless expansion. Ask any musician (or for that matter, magician) about the limits to his music (magic) at any given moment and if he is honest he will tell you he cannot ever do it all. Creating requires the limits, as Hicks admits as she tries to reach beyond them.
That's an incredibly provocative comment, Christopher, and I cannot say with certainty that I understand all of what you're saying.
However, I am in total agreement when you say, "I have for years now taken what seems infinite from our present vantage and substituted the term indeterminate, meaning the limits are there but cannot be seen or sensed, just as apparent space time expansion may be the translation of the actual loss of time at the outer edges."
I am not a confirmed believer in human's ability to comprehend reality on a cosmic scale. Mathematics and physics seem, at best, to be rudimentary tools, not really different than the way Stone Age man attributed the wind to a giant god blowing his breath across the landscape. Time disappearing at the edge of the universe sounds good to me!
I enjoy the breadth of your intellect on these matters, Christopher, and appreciate your effort in posting your comments here.
3 comments:
It is just out, that the conundrum of the requirements of dark energy, being completely invisible and yet 75% of everything to support the apparent expansion of all space/time, that this situation may be illusory based on changing one fundamental assumption. If time is actually created as agreed in the big bang, then at the edges of things it is destroyed. Such a universe will appear to expand in the disappearance of time. This works mathematically and we already know that time varies with the approach to the cosmic speed limit, the velocity of light in a perfect vacuum.
Thus limits are not in this ultimate cosmic sense illusory but instead are fundamental and thinking about limitless expansion is dangerous without taking extreme care. If time is created once and then disappears over the course of things, all change comes to an end as well. We already have this inkling in the second law of thermodynamics. It is entirely possible that we have not yet got our vision right at all.
I have for years now taken what seems infinite from our present vantage and substituted the term indeterminate, meaning the limits are there but cannot be seen or sensed, just as apparent space time expansion may be the translation of the actual loss of time at the outer edges. It is too easy to stop short and then put on glasses of the chosen and desired hue. There is sufficient room for this to almost work out if you are willing to risk the surprise reversals inherent in the error.
Accepting the larger roominess that is inherent in our tendency to grow into our own capacity as a practice is not the same as limitless expansion. Ask any musician (or for that matter, magician) about the limits to his music (magic) at any given moment and if he is honest he will tell you he cannot ever do it all. Creating requires the limits, as Hicks admits as she tries to reach beyond them.
That's an incredibly provocative comment, Christopher, and I cannot say with certainty that I understand all of what you're saying.
However, I am in total agreement when you say, "I have for years now taken what seems infinite from our present vantage and substituted the term indeterminate, meaning the limits are there but cannot be seen or sensed, just as apparent space time expansion may be the translation of the actual loss of time at the outer edges."
I am not a confirmed believer in human's ability to comprehend reality on a cosmic scale. Mathematics and physics seem, at best, to be rudimentary tools, not really different than the way Stone Age man attributed the wind to a giant god blowing his breath across the landscape. Time disappearing at the edge of the universe sounds good to me!
I enjoy the breadth of your intellect on these matters, Christopher, and appreciate your effort in posting your comments here.
great one. thanks for posting greg!
Post a Comment