THIS BLOG CURRENTLY IS INACTIVE. THANK YOU FOR STOPPING BY . . . . THIS BLOG CURRENTLY IS INACTIVE. THANK YOU FOR STOPPING BY . . . . THIS BLOG CURRENTLY IS INACTIVE . . . . THANK YOU FOR STOPPING BY.

Friday, February 18, 2011

Is the Future Leaking into the Present? Maybe So.

Alice and the White Queen.

Ordinary people may be altered by experiences they haven't had yet, indicating the future can leak into the present. At least that’s the conclusion of a respected psychology professor, Daryl Bem of Cornell.

According to NPR:
Already critics are jumping up and down, saying this can't be, time is not porous, the experiments are flawed. But because this is the Professor Daryl Bem (he's in your high school textbook for his work on self perception) and because the journal publishing his article is top-of-the-line rigorous, all over the world psychologists are trying to duplicate what Dr. Bem has done. If serious scientists can repeat his results, this story is going to be big. 
The NPR article describes two experiments Bem conducted at Cornell that seem to prove his hypothesis. The article concludes:
So who knows? Maybe psychologists, like quantum physicists, will have to deal with the deep strangeness of our universe. Maybe time doesn't behave properly. Maybe it makes little leaps, suddenly appears uninvited when porn is in the air. Or maybe not.
It's not like we've never thought about this before. In his paper Bem recalls that in Through the Looking Glass, the White Queen casually mentions to Alice that in her realm, "memory works both ways."
Not only does the Queen remember past events, she can also remember "things that happened the week after next."
Alice, always puzzled, says, "I'm sure mine only works one way... I can't remember things before they happen." The Queen seems a little sorry for Alice. "It's a poor sort of memory that only works backwards," she says.
In a year or so, Bem suggests, we may have to agree with the Queen.

Click here for the article. 

2 comments:

christopher said...

I seem to recall reading somewhere that this flash of positive results is a typical result that then fades away. Repeatability checks seem to wear out the phenomena.

People think about it for a while and then wander off.

I get the same almost set in stone response in using I Ching.

I think the leaking of time is real and also unrepeatable in this way. It is what has happened using oracles for over six thousand years.

It is worth revising one's thinking about time to include this possibility. One version of that kind of thinking was developed by John Michell in his Ouspensky-Gurdjieffian book, Living Time.

COL said...

thanks for sharing greg. fascinating!